|
|
Post by George61 on Jun 15, 2005 19:28:57 GMT 7
You have used that word before....it wasn't spelt rite then, and now, even tho I corrected you, you have spelled it wrong again.....SUCCINCT!! 
|
|
|
|
Post by con's fly is open on Jun 15, 2005 20:27:28 GMT 7
I'm gonna voice what I think everyone else is thinking:
That was one hell of a reply letter. He admitted the truth unreservedly, and claims to have reformed the system.
Millana, maybe that's a good sign. I know my school screwed up with previous FTs before me, and I inherited the results of people who admit and fix their mistakes.
Maybe you should give it another think. Maybe.
I suppose that was worse than no advice at all, in some ways. Wish I could be more insightful, but that's all I got.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Nobody on Jun 16, 2005 8:01:58 GMT 7
Nah, my feeling is that it is just a letter. Proof of the pudding is in the eating. It is just advertising. Don't risk it. Go elsewhere. Plenty of fish in the sea.
Other hackneyed phrases in similar vein can be added here at your discretion. I just wanted to be succinct.
|
|
