|
|
Post by The Canink on Dec 9, 2006 13:27:22 GMT 7
Snapped with my phone again, so the quality isn't so great. Also the angle isn't very good. This truly was a case of truth in advertising -- one which didn't come across well in the photo, I'm afraid.  |
|
|
|
Post by George61 on Dec 9, 2006 13:50:20 GMT 7
Nice one!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by solongtinik on Dec 9, 2006 20:00:41 GMT 7
 juicier here...LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by George61 on Dec 10, 2006 1:35:34 GMT 7
What's the saying??.....all talk and no trousers!  |
|
|
|
Post by Raoul Duke on Dec 10, 2006 5:29:48 GMT 7
A request, Canink...some of the better ones...instead of posting them here, e-mail them to me as possible Pictures Of The Week. You'll be credited.
This one woulda made the cover.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Canink on Dec 10, 2006 11:31:11 GMT 7
Hey, feel free to just snarf them from the forums. Once I put something out on the Internet, I know that I lose all control over its movement anyway.  |
|
|
|
Post by Raoul Duke on Dec 10, 2006 15:08:19 GMT 7
But generally, if a photo has already appeared elsewhere on the forum, I don't put them on the cover....
|
|
|
|
Post by The Canink on Dec 10, 2006 17:20:31 GMT 7
Oh, I see. The trouble here is that I'm not really quite as egotistical as I come across as. I see a picture I think is cute, I'll post it. But for me to say "this is probably a picture-of-the-<foo>" is a bit too egotistical even for me.
What's the protocol? Should I just start bombarding you with photographs in the hopes that you like them?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Canink on Dec 10, 2006 17:22:38 GMT 7
To supplement the question, I have some photos of my visits to a Chinese graveyard. I suspect not a lot of people go to those. Would those be best mailed to you first for your perusal or should I just post away?
|
|
|
|
Post by Raoul Duke on Dec 11, 2006 1:26:13 GMT 7
Yes.
If they're weird and/or funny, send them to me as possible cover pics.
If they're cool and/or interesting and/or pretty, post them here.
Closest to a protocol I can think of.
|
|
