Post by burlives on Mar 17, 2005 10:51:06 GMT 7
People talk about negotiation in China. The talk is usually shallow. Something about giving gifts and following forms.
If I am to believe Chinese friends, negotiation is bargaining with sophistic rhetoric, saying things like, "well, I know the government conditions and what you offer is illegal, so if you can do illegal things, surely I can too." Such a device is supposed to encourage the interlocutor to up his offer to a government standard. It's not what Chinese would call chewing the words, it's chewing the worthless gristle out of the ideas. Also, it's better if one can talk fast. Negotiation, at least initially, is speed chess.
So it depends on character type? Everything does, though, doesn't it. As a defeatist quitter I feel a hopeless frustration when people hide the truth. I am happy to bullpoo, but who bullpoos in English these days? I suspect that when English is the medium, negotiation rarely gets past the first stage, the listing of outrageous restrictions and slum-like conditions. I also suspect that negotiation is a process that generates a social relationship -- the act of applying rhetorical devices to one another sets the scene for fellow feeling (which really should not be confused with, or even likened to, mutual understanding, though it invariably is). And gift-giving is for after that social relationship is established.
So just as Chinese are unable to make a plan, unable to create a schedule, so they are open changes in plans, to negotiation, and still equally unable to create a real schedule of merit and its reward.
That, and they're the meanest, cheapest-spirited people walking the face of the earth. After age 30 if they knew what one was they'd all be lawyers.
If I am to believe Chinese friends, negotiation is bargaining with sophistic rhetoric, saying things like, "well, I know the government conditions and what you offer is illegal, so if you can do illegal things, surely I can too." Such a device is supposed to encourage the interlocutor to up his offer to a government standard. It's not what Chinese would call chewing the words, it's chewing the worthless gristle out of the ideas. Also, it's better if one can talk fast. Negotiation, at least initially, is speed chess.
So it depends on character type? Everything does, though, doesn't it. As a defeatist quitter I feel a hopeless frustration when people hide the truth. I am happy to bullpoo, but who bullpoos in English these days? I suspect that when English is the medium, negotiation rarely gets past the first stage, the listing of outrageous restrictions and slum-like conditions. I also suspect that negotiation is a process that generates a social relationship -- the act of applying rhetorical devices to one another sets the scene for fellow feeling (which really should not be confused with, or even likened to, mutual understanding, though it invariably is). And gift-giving is for after that social relationship is established.
So just as Chinese are unable to make a plan, unable to create a schedule, so they are open changes in plans, to negotiation, and still equally unable to create a real schedule of merit and its reward.
That, and they're the meanest, cheapest-spirited people walking the face of the earth. After age 30 if they knew what one was they'd all be lawyers.